Summer Daze

iShuffle

author.png Posted by Chris date.png Sun 8 Apr time.png 01:13 [Tag] Purchases, Reviews views.png 210 Views

 
No I'm not going mad, I didn't really purchase an iPod Shuffle it was a "free" gift from audible.com when I joined for 12 months.

Now as you may or may not know, I'm not an apple fan. Why? Because I'm governed by sense and people with sense don't buy Apple products, people with more money than sense do Cheeky. Although the hardware is very good and certainly well styled it's worth more than it's values at and I never pay for brands or a flashy design, I leave that to the folly. Not that I'm against anyone who has an Apple product! just those that have them for the Apple brand or because said product "looks nice" but each to his/her own eh?

Anyway here is a mini write-up of the iPod shuffle which I will call the iShuffle as it little resembles an iPod anyway.

/media/purchases/iPod_shuffle.jpg


First things first, packaging very nice, very smart. The device? Looks really nice, very practical size, nice little docking station, solid design, feels very well made.

Now the important stuff. The sound? Quite pleasing actually, ear phones are surprisingly quite good (but from excellent), iShuffle has a good reproduction of high and mid range though I felt the bass to be a bit lacking. This was especially evident when communing as background noise washes out the already low amount of bass.

Aside from the bass issue, a fairly loud hiss is present when the device is switched on, headphones mask this but the supplied ear buds don't. Unbelievably stupid method for music transfer. Having to use a special app to transfer music because the device is too stupid to operate without a database. I gather this is standard operation for iPod, thank goodness I never bought one. Where is the sense in this? Think of the easy of dragging files across to the mass storage device, oh wait that wouldn't help tie the device to iTunes so well. Since I use Linux GTKPod was used instead of iTunes but still, no database should be needed.

Another major problem is lack of OGG support or some codec that's better than MP3 or AAC. I did give AAC a go but was very disappointed, didn't really seem much, if any better than MP3 could be due to the encode though. MP3 is awful, I don't care what bit-rate it's at somehow music sounds "muddied". I pity all who use it unless of course, they don't care or can't tell the difference anyway. MP3 is bearable at 256KBps VBR. OGG is perfect (as in you can tell the difference but you have to really listen for it) at Q5 (160Kbps VBR) the result in filesize is huge and for a 1GB device makes all the difference. I am displeased with Apple for not implementing a superior and patent free audio format, but Apple aren't here to make a great device for their customers but a great impression on their bank account which means they wont go to any lengths to make something better unless it puts money in their pocket.

An obvious problem is no screen so no song selection however this can be seen as a plus. Never again would I have to choose which album to listen to, but then again why not activate the shuffle mode on my iRiver? Then there's song storage, Apple like to pretend you can fit 240 songs on, you can of course if you are partially deaf and don't mind 128Kbps MP3. However for the connoisseur of audio quality at least 192, preferably 256KBPs VBR MP3 is a more likely choice resulting in a mere 130 songs. A far cry from the thousands I have on my iRiver but for a device that is built to shuffle through a selection of your favourite tracks, quite adequate. Also the lack of screen means no equaliser, a customary bass boot button could have been added but wasn't.

But lets not kid ourself! This device actually has little purpose as a standalone music player, many people carry mobile phones on their person. Many mobile phone can play MP3, for £35 you can get a 2GB memory card. So already you have twice the storage size for half the price with no need to use a stupid database managing program. If my mobile phone could play OGG and had a 20GB hard drive I would not care for my iRiver but phones don't do such things... yet. I have isolated three instances where this device actually has a use however! Firstly, jogging, a small lightweight player is essential providing you don't already take your phone with you when you jog. Secondly, audio books. If you use the device for audio books solely it will remember the place you were last at in the book and continue playing from there on. Thirdly it makes an excellent backup device. Supposing your real audio player's batteries had died or you were late and couldn't find it but needed to rush out. Sadly those are the only examples I can see it being of any use. Of course when it can hold 20GB, has a screen and plays OGG it will be a marvellous device! Well providing it had an equaliser and you plug some decent headphones into it Smileing

One thing I must rant about before the review is over is Apple's stupid marketing of this device. Apple would like you to wear this device as a "badge to show your musical devotion" or better still a device that can "make your musical fashion statement". Where do I keep mine? In my pocket, why? Well firstly because it's the sensible thing to do as there are many evil minded people in the West Midlands, UK who would not hesitate to steal the iShuffle if you advertise it like this and secondly because I don't want to make a musical fashion statement, my intellect is not so low nor my personality so dull that I need to gain self worth from showing off an Apple product or any other gadget to be fair.

To conclude I have trialled this little device and for all it's flaws, I can't help but like it purely because of it's ease of charging (just drop it back in it's docking station) and of course very portable size. It's nice to keep around in case of emergencies (forgetting to charge iRiver batteries, breaking headphones and so on). So there you have it, a mini review from a person who dislikes Apple as a company but realises they produce great hardware. I have tried to be unbiased and analyse what I regard as the faults and have certainly not been kind to the device solely based on it's nice design and/or Apple brand name Cheeky

comment.png 7 Comments
Monday 1st December 2008 @ 16:43
vortex566

Location:
Joined: 07/06/07
Great review as always I agree with a lot of what you had to say. Me been a runner it really is a godsend having such a small device
Monday 1st December 2008 @ 16:43
Tim


Location: United Kingdom
Joined: 26/03/05
Nice review. Im on the other side, I love apple products not for the name more the simplicity. I have a green ipod nano and love it to bits, And having to use iTunes is not a problem as i find it a very good media player. I especialy enjoy the Cover Flow feature alowing you to flick through album covers for even more ease.
 
My deviantART gallery
Monday 1st December 2008 @ 16:43
vortex566

Location:
Joined: 07/06/07
No OGG support, vendor lock in, DRM just 3 of the reasons why iTunes will never be used by me.Also the amount of advertisements you get in iTunes is just a joke. Having owned a mac I had little choice but to use it but I would never use it on my windows machine.
Monday 1st December 2008 @ 16:43
Chris


Location: West Midlands, UK
Joined: 24/03/05
I don't know, I would say that was the other side? As I said I like the hardware but not Apple as a company or for the brand name. Having to use iTunes isn't a problem if a). You like I tunes b). You like Windows or MacOS lol. I dislike all three Cheeky Windows, or MacOS aren't so bad but I really have a strong disliking for iTunes or any other media player that resembles it. Just preference. You said you like simplicity? Well so do I, see Muine (http://muine-player.org) my music player. Doesn't get much more simple than Muine lol.

Aside from the design, the other problem I have with iTunes is DRM and vendor lock-in but these of course standard with any commercial software just backing up my opinion with reason though. Wouldn't want to say I dislike iTunes without unfairly explaining why of course.
Monday 1st December 2008 @ 16:43
Dugahole


Location: Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
Joined: 27/03/05
I dispise Apple and Ipod, I would never buy an ipod because I hate the control funtion and like you said it is too much of a fashion statement for my liking. I had to use my mates because he wanted to burn some CDs and couldnt do it so I volunteered. Itunes is the worst software I have ever come across, repeat THE WORST

No one could ever persuade me to buy an ipod, and I am quite happy with my creative zen Grining
Monday 1st December 2008 @ 16:43
Tim


Location: United Kingdom
Joined: 26/03/05
really ? I just really have this love for itunes lol but the worst ive used has to be WinAmp
 
My deviantART gallery
Monday 1st December 2008 @ 16:43
Chris


Location: West Midlands, UK
Joined: 24/03/05
Hm, I wouldn't say I hate iTunes just it feels limited, bloated and I hate advertisements with a burning passion so it doesn't really meet my needs. As for WinAmp well, never been a fan since it left the 2.x series and the fact that it doesn't run on my operating system again means it doesn't meet my needs lol

Submit your comment

 
You must be a registered user and logged-in to post comments.

Login or Register
 
View All - View Archive Page:     1 2 3 ... 38 39 40 [Next]