Microsoft's Best Operating System Introducing Windows XP an operating system so ahead of it's time it better Vista! Well, I managed to live/struggle/work with Vista for nearly a whole month. After the novelty of the new theme and window effects wore off, which took all of a few days, the problems with Vista became apparent.
XP betters vista in several ways, performance of games, better drivers, better stability, better support, better theme, better organisation of menu's and GUI's. Vista betters XP with, it's tabbed switching, the thumbnail of closed applications, tighter integration of sound card drivers/applications and of course Mahjong Titans providing you have the business or ultimate edition. In the time that I ran Vista for I had no fewer than five BSOD's (Blue Screens of Death). Lets compare this with the three BSOD's I have had whilst running XP for several years, now I know this is possibly and perhaps most likely a driver issue but for the time being at least this is totally unacceptable. Then there's the issue of performance, Vista doesn't seem to like running on anything less than 2GB of RAM. I have no need for 2GB of RAM, Linux does not need it, no game I own needs it and I'm certainly not buying another 1GB just for an OS when I can use XP with 1GB of RAM for free. On to the games performance, I'm not much of a gamer but Windows exists solely on my machine for gaming and programming. Gaming was awful, every game I tried had serious performance issues, again this could be due to drivers or perhaps the 1GB of RAM but again, why not just run XP? I did not spend £630 on a computer upgrade to have it perform only as well as my previous system did! Visual Studio was given a new feature under Vista. Random crashes. Yes this Microsoft product is marked as being incompatible with Vista! and the crashes seem to back this statement up. The theme, what has gone on here? Too much "shine" to be a serious theme. "Last-ability" or how long you can look at a theme without it becoming "old" is of the utmost importance. I will admit that upon first glance I was wowed by the design but a few days later I was longing for something more toned down and easier on the eye so I switched back to the classic Windows look which gave quite a surprising performance boost even for a pretty fast Dual Core system. I was able to skin Vista with the standard uxtheme.dll patching method however I could only find one skin available that was just as much to my disliking as the default anyway. I also tried the "Royale" skin from XP Media Centre but Vista decided it would install it but wouldn't use it even though it was a selectable option. Oh, how I love Creative's Beta Audigy 2 drivers. I won't go into detail but lets just say they are the worst drivers I have used to date (save perhaps the ATi Linux drivers?). Lots of sound problems, game crashes, audio editors that would not work and so on. The alone is reason enough for me to move back to XP to be honest. They are just abysmal and, according to what I have heard, Creative have no plans to update them. I seriously hope this is incorrect. So what has it taken Microsoft so long to do? Bugger all to be fair, a reorganisation of menu's, a more annoying security permissions "feature", some ridiculous requirements, worse performance now just add in a few cheap desktop effects and a theme and icon set that's just to "flash" for "Last-ability" and you have Vista. Oh wait, I forgot the gadgets. I wont go into those "gimmicks" because they are not worth writing about nobody needs a "speedometer" on their desktop for their CPU usage. Vista finally allows you to delete the recycle bin from your desktop without some registry hack (at last!), desktop icons are pointless but Microsoft haven't realised this along with most of their customers who have yet to be shown why. What hasn't it taken Microsoft so long to do. Include theme support, how hard can this be? There has been no improvement on how configurable the taskbar is. Take a look at KDE or Gnome's panel not OSX's dock (Good Lord!), Users should be able to place things where they want them. Font size, font size, font size! Oh what a joke, why can you not change the font size on Microsoft Operating Systems, you can instead only change the sizes of a selection places where fonts are used. So change the DPI? Yeah Microsoft managed to bugger up that option too, changing the DPI also set's the "bugger up my icons my making them look like they are drawn in gigantic centimetre square pixels" option to true. I moved to Vista in spite of all the nay saying and criticism surrounding it with an open mind. I was initially fairly impressed until the problems became clear and that problem was that it's not as good as XP. Inevitably it will improve but to be honest even after doing so I don't see it as being worth the money.
|